PUBL0215 - Blog

Dissipating Majorities Under Polarization, Over-governance, Under-representation, and Fading Trust

The experience of France and Emmanuel Macron’s centrist project encapsulates a wider trend, that challenges traditional political chessboard.

France has been grappling with political instability since the snap legislative elections in July 2024, which produced a hung parliament. This marked the beginning of the 2024-2025 French political crisis, the most severe in the history of the Fifth Republic,. This crises stems from deep fragmentation in the National Assembly, exacerbated by economic pressures, a ballooning budget deficit, and the need to pass annual budgets. With President Emmanuel Macron ineligible to run again in the 2027 presidential election, all major parties are maneuvering to gain strategic advantage and better positioning.

The rapid turnover of prime ministers coupled with stalled budgets in France isn’t an isolated anomaly but seems like a symptom of broader turbulence of political volatility, institutional fragmentation, and declining executive durability across Western democracies. Europe and the West face interconnected risks that could erode stability, economic resilience, and global influence if unaddressed. A decade-long populist backlash and polarization, Covid-19 economic scars and other pressing challenges, political fatigue and accelerating geopolitical shifts, as well as current economic, social, and political trends point to a slow entropy in – democratic – governance.

Both France and UK historically have ran on strong majoritarian systems, but that structure doesn’t seem to hold anymore. In France, the collapse of the Socialist Party and the Republicans left Emmanuel Macron’s centrist bloc governing without grassroots or ideological infrastructure. Since 2022 National Assembly has lacked an absolute majority, forcing short-term alliances. Citizens feel both over-governed and under-represented. This institutional entropy, as bloc claim to speak for the people, but none can legislate without walking on a tightrope, lead to expended Prime Ministers. In a semi-presidential system, when the president’s majority is weak, the PM becomes both a lightning rod and an expendable shield. The Fifth Republic’s constitutional, designed for strong presidents with stable majorities, now faces its fragility as the premise of majority dissipates.

In the UK, USA, Germany, Italy and Denmark, witness a deep loss of public confidence in democracy and in a better future. The majority of participants in a recent survey, believe that “political decisions are made without realistic plans for implementation”, while expectations on “no improvement in the Dutch and Britain societies over the next decades” score high.[1] Italy, Spain, and Israel face the same fragility. Since Charles de Gaulle the presidential monarchy has underpinned and carried the Fifth Republic. However, leadership turnover is the visible symptom of a deeper disease in the age of fragmented electorates. The divisions aren’t just Left versus Right anymore; but there are more axes, identity politics, economic grievances, regional divides, along with loss of internal unity and dividing coalitions, political fatigue and public discontent, as well as exacerbating challenges.

The broader pattern we can locate is democratic backsliding due to polarization, with countries globally deteriorating in democratic metrics, while Europe hits hardest in civil liberties and elections.[2] Emerging key trends involve the rise of populism and fragmentation, economic stagnation and inequality, geopolitical vulnerabilities and the escalation of threats, climate and societal shocks, together with freedom deterioration. As far-rights and far-left gains erode centrist majorities, we may lead to parliamentary divisions and coalition fracturing. Moreover, economic instability in addition to low economic freedom strengthens inflation, accelerates industrial decline, widens societal divides fueling protests, as well as threatens global trade and supply chains. In the same context the continuation of two conflicts on the periphery of Europe besides posing significant challenges to Europe and its transatlantic ties, straining budgets and increasing budgetary pressures, it is also testing the capabilities, resilience, and limits of NATO.

The July 2024 snap elections, following the EU elections, produced a National Assembly split into three irreconcilable blocs. No bloc can form a majority without cross-ideological deals. New Popular Front, who holds the majority of the seats, seeks to reverse the pension reforms, increase social spending, and challenges the president directly interpreting this crisis as Macron’s “power grab” and demanding a progressive Prime Minister coupled with reversal of austerity. Centrists, including Macron’s party, prioritize EU, fiscal austerity, and pro-business policies, blaming “irresponsible” opposition for blocking voting, and they seek a technocratic or center-left figure to stabilize budgets without empowering polarization.[3] On the other hand, right-wing coalitions – including National Rally – focus on law and order, immigration curbs and tax cuts. In parallel, they see opportunity in chaos, abstaining from no-confidence votes while pushing for elections.[4] The distribution of parliamentary seats has forced reliance on minority governments, as we witness repeated no-confidence motions, and has led to five prime ministerial changes since 2022. As of October 7, 2025, France is in a state of interim governance following President Macron acceptance of Lecornu’s resignation.[5] The country is without a prime minister, budget implementation is stalled, 2025 spending hold on emergency measures while the 2026 budget remains unresolved, risking credit downgrades and fines on behalf of the EU.[6]

For half a century France operated under a bipolar system: Socialists versus Gaullists and later Republicans. That equilibrium crumpled in the 2010s. The Socialist Party collapsed under the weight of Hollande’s presidency, as the Republicans couldn’t recover from Sarkozy’s scandals and their ideological confusion. The 2017 election marked the implosion of that binary structure and Emmanuel Macron’s movement generated a hybridize center, integrating fragments from both sides but built around a personalized political formation. President Macron, increasingly isolated, faces calls to resign from the left, and dissolution demands from the rights. A recent survey confirms the growing discontent towards French President. 70% of voters are in favor of his resignation and 87% consider him responsible for the political crisis in France.[7] The president holds significant power when it comes to foreign policy and the military strength. In recent months he has reached agreements regarding support towards Ukraine and recognition of the state of Palestine, has secured for France strategic agreements, and cooperation and trade deals, but also has pushed for a High Seas Treaty.[8] However, domestic paralysis holds back reforms.[9] Analysts describe it as “dancing on the ruins” of the Fifth Republic’s majority-based system.[10]

Efforts to restore fiscal balance through pension, healthcare and education cuts, face fierce resistance from opposition. Inflation, youth unemployment, and the high cost of living have reignited grievances deepening rural alienation and anti-elite sentiment, strengthening the parliamentary influence of both far Right and Left, and reviving the perception of a Jupitarian presidency.[11] Small business, still recovering from COVID-19 shocks, face uncertainty. Nevertheless, COVID-19 lockdowns and vaccination policies, in addition to eroding trust on centralized governance, they exposed structural weaknesses, widened inequality by disproportionately affecting low-wage workers and youth, as well as deepened mental health crises. Finally, the fragmentation of the political landscape, dating back to Emmanuel Macron’s 2017 presidency, reached a peak with the results of the June-July 2024 elections as Macron’s gamble – hoping to clarify the mandate – resulted on a three-bloc split with no bloc holding the majority. Enforcing divisions led to economic instability that fuels public distrust and risks further social unrest. France, Europe’s largest public spender and second in social protection expenditure, faces maintaining fiscal stress and undermining financial credibility. Market credibility is deteriorating with the biggest drag being on the banking sector and the CAC 40 index falling amid fears over fiscal governance.[12] Rating agencies have sounded alarms as Moody has already cut France’s long-term issuer and senior debt rating to Aa3 from Aa2 in December 2024, and the Fitch agency downgraded France’s credit rating from AA- to A+ in September 2025. Citing weakening public finances and political fragmentation they have warned for further downgrading and rising of the country’s debt until 2027, shall it not take urgent action.[13] A rating downgrade tends to increase spreads on sovereign bonds, raising France’s interest costs. This is especially dangerous when debt is already high. Some worry that should France’s economy continue the downfall, Euro-zone’s stability could come under threat.[14]

A gap between institutions of representation and an increasingly individualized electorate, multiparty coalitions, leaders cycling through a void without long-term anchoring; Peter Mair reached to the conclusion that “the age of party democracy has passed”. The 2022 and 2024 legislative elections confirmed a new equilibrium. The National Assembly has become a field of shifting – tactical and strategical – alliances. A hybrid system emerges. Still presidential, but functionally pluralistic and unstable, unless this pluralism becomes the cornerstone. It reminds us of Italy in 1990s, after the collapse of its post-war parties, in terms of traditional party system collapse; the rise of populist figures that gain support by positioning themselves as alternatives to the traditional political chessboard; together with the formation of short-lived coalitions that lead to frequent changes.

The outcomes of this period of transformation will depend on the ability of political actors to adapt to the changing landscape and to find new ways to achieve political stability, plurality, and effective governance. If the 20th century prized durability in parties and programs, the 21st century seems to seek adaptability. Mirroring what sociologist Zygmunt Bauman called liquid modernity, institutional adaptation to volatility and the embracing of this fluidity could be translated in the transformation of the landscape and social cohesion. Systems survive now not by being rigid, but by being flowing. On one hand this doesn’t necessarily weaken democracy but rather could evolve it into a more transactional, as well as policy, than coalition, based form. On the other hand the danger is that fluidity without direction could put a country in a loop and a constant motion without progress. Italy in the 2000s tried to adapt to mobility, but attempts for structural reform failed, policy coherence eroded and citizens’ trust in institutions sank.[15] Yet, Nordic and Benelux states have managed to make coalition flexibility a virtue, embedding compromise and proportional representation into political culture.[16]

REFERENCES

  1. Institut for vilde problemer, “NEW GLOBAL DATA: Citizens in Western Democracies Have Lost Faith in Political Progress”, 2025, https://www.invi.nu/nyheder/western-pop-lost-faith.

  2. Marina Nord, David Altman, Fabio Angiolillo, Tiagoo Fernandes, Ana Good God, and Staffan I. Lindberg, “Democracy Report 2025: 25 Years of Autocratization – Democracy Trumped?”, University of Gothenburg: V-Dem Institute, March 2025,https://www.v-dem.net/documents/61/v-dem-dr__2025_lowres_v2.pdf. IDEA International, “The state of democracy in Europe”, 2023, https://www.idea.int/gsod/2023/chapters/europe/. Freedom House, “The Mounting Damage of Flawed Elections and Armed Conflict”, February 2024, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2024/mounting-damage-flawed-elections-and-armed-conflict.

  3. Roger Cohen, “As France Faces Political Turmoil, Macron Is Backed Into a Corner”, The New York Times, October 07, 2025, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/07/world/europe/france-government-turmoil-sebastien-lecornu.html.

  4. Reuters, “France’s political crisis: How did we get here and what comes next?”, October 06, 2025, https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/why-is-france-mired-rolling-political-crisis-2025-10-06/.

  5. The Economist, “France’s Fifth Republic is in unprecedented turmoil”, October 06, 2025, https://www.economist.com/europe/2025/10/06/frances-fifth-republic-is-in-unprecedented-turmoil.

  6. John Leicester, “France’s government collapses again: What could happen next?”, Associated Press, October 07, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/france-macron-lecornu-government-politics-ca3482440dc47cd04960b3f171b7ad22.

  7. Carlos Fresneda, “70% of the French in favor of Macron’s resignation”, El Mundo America, October 07, 2025, https://www.mundoamerica.com/news/2025/10/07/68e534a021efa0b5078b45c6.html.

  8. Romain Fathi, “Emmanuel Macron’s presidency is in survival mode. How did France’s political paralysis get so bad?”, The Conversation, September 10, 2025, https://theconversation.com/emmanuel-macrons-presidency-is-in-survival-mode-how-did-frances-political-paralysis-get-so-bad-264870.

  9. Samuel Petrequin & John Leicester, “Macron’s political isolation deepens as allies abandon him, with some calling for his resignation”, Associated Press, October 07, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/france-politics-macron-le-pen-attal-philippe-383fda308dc2c06f70d9749e18848d8f.

  10. Roger Cohen, “As France Faces Political Turmoil, Macron Is Backed Into a Corner”.

  11. Pierre Briançon, “Macron’s ‘Jupiter’ model unlikely to stand test of time”, Politico, June 16, 2017, https://www.politico.eu/article/emmanuel-macron-jupiter-model-unlikely-to-stand-test-of-time-leadership-parliamentary-majority/.

  12. Navamya Acharya, “CAC 40 falls after French Prime Minister resigns”, Investigating.com, https://www.investing.com/news/stock-market-news/cac-40-falls-after-french-prime-minister-resigns-4271833. Ana Nicolaci da Costa, “Fall of yet another premier will make it hard for France to fix its finances. What’s behind its debt problem?”, CNN Business, October 09, 2025, https://edition.cnn.com/2025/10/08/business/france-debt-problem-government-crisis-intl.

  13. Marc Angrand, “Financial markets forced to adapt to French political uncertainty”, Le Monde, October 07, 2025, https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2025/10/07/financial-markets-forced-to-adapt-to-french-political-uncertainty_6746170_19.html.

  14. Hilary Schmidt, “Credit-Rating Downgrades Underscore France’s Increasingly Precarious Fiscal Outlook”, International Banker, September 25, 2025, https://internationalbanker.com/finance/credit-rating-downgrades-underscore-frances-increasingly-precarious-fiscal-outlook/.

  15. Silveri Umberto Gentiloni, “Italy 1990–2014: The Transition That Never Happened”, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 20 (2): 171–75, 2015 doi:10.1080/1354571X.2015.997489.

  16. Ian Simpson, “Norway’s election shows how multi-party politics doesn’t have to mean random results”, Electoral Reform Society, September 10, 2025, https://electoral-reform.org.uk/norways-election-shows-how-multi-party-politics-doesnt-have-to-mean-random-results/. David Willumsen & Simon Otjes, “The Netherlands shows the democratic pitfalls of proportional representation”, London Scool of Economics and Political Science, July 31, 2024, https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2024/07/31/the-netherlands-shows-the-democratic-pitfalls-of-proportional-representation/.

Author

DISCLOSURE

All written content of this article on this site is the exclusive copyright and property of Strategy International (SI) Ltd and the author who has written to It.

To note, the opinions stated do not necessarily reflect the official policies of Strategy International.

No prior use in part or in its complete form, written, words, maps, charts or statistical, numerical information can be made, unless there is a written prior request and consent by the author and Strategy International and its legal representative.

All requests should be directed at info@strategyinternational.org

error: Content is protected !