The author of this article is Dr. Nikolaos Katsiotis.

Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are emerging as the definitive technological breakthrough in the quest for energy security in a hyper-digitalized, decarbonized and electrified world. With global electricity demand projected to surge by 50% by 2040 [1], the energy landscape is at a critical juncture. The explosive rise of high-performance computing (HPC), artificial intelligence (AI), large-scale cloud infrastructure and the Internet of Things (IoT) has placed unprecedented strain on conventional power grids [2]. At the same time, the shift toward sustainability, geopolitical instability in energy markets and the limitations of renewables have forced policymakers and industries to explore alternative solutions. [3]

Against this backdrop, SMRs offer an unparalleled combination of scalability, stability and low-carbon intensity, uniquely positioned to meet the needs of an era where data is as critical as electricity itself. [4] Unlike traditional nuclear power plants that require years—sometimes decades—of regulatory approval and construction, SMRs provide a flexible, rapidly deployable and cost-effective alternative for securing digital and industrial resilience.

A Digitalized World in an Energy Crisis: SMRs as the Key to Grid Resilience

The modern economy is fueled by data and data demands an extraordinary amount of electricity. Data centers currently account for 3% of global electricity demand [5]—already on par with the entire energy consumption of Japan [6]—and this figure is expected to double within the next decade. The International Energy Agency (IEA) estimates that by 2040, data centers and AI-related workloads could consume more electricity than all of Germany today. [7]

AI training models, particularly large language models (LLMs) like OpenAI’s GPT-4, DeepMind’s Gemini and Meta’s LLaMA, require vast amounts of computational power. Training a single GPT-4-class model can consume up to 10 GWh—enough to power 10,000 European homes for a year. In comparison, Google’s data centers alone consumed over 18 TWh in 2021, 22 TWh in 2022 and 26 TWh in 2023, numbers that are projected to grow exponentially as AI integration, quantum computing and decentralized blockchain networks expand. [8, 9, 10]

Renewable sources, while critical to decarbonization, cannot provide the uninterrupted 24/7 baseload power that AI servers and quantum networks require. [11] Solar and wind energy, despite their massive rollout, suffer from intermittency issues and geographic constraints. [12] Large-scale battery storage solutions, such as Tesla’s Megapack or iron-flow battery technologies, remain costly and impractical for consistent high-density power loads. [13] This is where SMRs stand out—providing a nuclear baseload solution that is carbon-free, scalable and capable of delivering uninterrupted, high-capacity power for mission-critical infrastructure.

“The Digital Era demands an Energy Revolution—one that is stable, scalable and secure.

SMRs are not just an option; they are the Future of Digital Power.”

The Market Potential: A $300 Billion (by 2040) Industry and Growing

Market analysts and key stakeholders estimate that global investments in SMRs could surpass $300 billion by 2040 [14], as more governments and private enterprises pivot toward nuclear microgrids to sustain digital and industrial operations. The commercial potential of SMRs is driven by their modularity, faster deployment cycles and lower capital requirements compared to conventional nuclear reactors. [15]

A PwC economic analysis of Westinghouse’s AP300 SMR deployment in Czechia projects a contribution of Kč 95.3 billion annually ($3.7 billion USD) to national GDP and 80,000 new job-years during the construction and operational phases. The same study estimates that the project will generate Kč 292.7 billion ($12.3 billion USD) in GDP impact during the manufacturing, engineering and construction phases. [16] Meanwhile, Canada’s investment in SMRs, particularly GE Hitachi’s BWRX-300, is expected to generate $28.7 billion in GDP impact and create over 125,000 person-years of employment. [17]

EY’s nuclear market outlook highlights that tech companies, energy-intensive industries and AI research institutions are now actively seeking direct investments in nuclear-backed power agreements. [18, 19] Google’s long-term contracts with nuclear operators for AI data centers [20] and Microsoft’s 835 MW nuclear-powered agreement with Constellation Energy [21] illustrate that corporate tech giants are now recognizing SMRs as indispensable to their future operational security.

KPMG’s SMR financial risk assessment emphasizes that, due to their modular nature and standardized production models, SMRs could reach a levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of $50–$75 per MWh—on par with solar and wind but without intermittency limitations. [22, 23] Their smaller scale allows for incremental investments rather than the billion-dollar commitments required for gigawatt-scale nuclear plants, reducing investor risk and attracting global financing from sovereign wealth funds and institutional investors.

SMRs Beyond the Digital Economy: Industrial, National Security and Humanitarian Applications

While the synergy between SMRs and digital infrastructure is evident, their potential extends far beyond data centers. Industrial applications, national security and humanitarian initiatives are all key sectors where SMRs will reshape energy security landscapes. [24]

Industries such as semiconductor fabrication, hydrogen production, aluminum smelting and ammonia synthesis all require constant high-density power loads that renewables alone cannot reliably provide. [25] The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) reports that hydrogen electrolysis powered by SMRs could cut green hydrogen production costs by 40% while ensuring continuous fuel cell output for heavy industry and maritime shipping. [26]

In the realm of national security, SMRs are critical assets for energy-resilient military infrastructure. The U.S. Department of Defense is actively developing deployable microreactors for forward operating bases, ensuring that military installations remain self-sufficient during cyberattacks or geopolitical energy crises. The Pentagon’s Project Pele, a 5 MWe mobile SMR, is slated for deployment by 2026, reinforcing the growing role of micro-nuclear technology in strategic defense planning. [27, 28]

“In a world where energy is the currency of progress, SMRs provide the security and scalability required to power the next industrial revolution.”

Policy, Investment and Future Deployment Roadmaps

Governments and policymakers are accelerating efforts to integrate SMRs into national energy portfolios, establishing legal frameworks to streamline licensing, financing and grid integration. [29]

The European Commission’s launch of the European SMR Industrial Alliance in 2024 signals a landmark moment in EU nuclear strategy, fostering cross-border collaboration to fast-track SMR research, supply chains and commercial deployment. [30] The U.K.’s Rolls-Royce SMR initiative, backed by £210 million in government investment, aims to construct up to 16 SMRs across Britain by 2040. [31]

In North America, the U.S. Department of Energy’s Project Phoenix is repurposing decommissioned coal plants into SMR hubs, utilizing existing grid connections and infrastructure to reduce costs and enhance deployment speed. [32] Canada’s $970 million SMR development fund is driving commercialization efforts for Ontario’s Darlington SMR project, which will be the first grid-connected SMR in the G7 by the early 2030s. [33] Similar studies for the Canada’s Darlington SMR project predict that SMRs will add over $28.7 billion CAD to GDP while significantly reducing grid volatility risks caused by fossil fuel dependency.

Meanwhile, in the Middle East and Africa, SMRs are gaining traction for off-grid electricity solutions, desalination projects and energy diversification strategies. Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Egypt are exploring SMRs for both energy security and industrial expansion, reducing reliance on fossil fuels while addressing water scarcity challenges through nuclear-powered desalination. [34, 35, 36]

The Financial Model of SMRs: Lower Capital Risk, Higher Long-Term Gains

Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) are redefining the financial, regulatory and operational landscape of nuclear energy, providing a bankable and scalable alternative to conventional large-scale nuclear power plants. As governments and industries worldwide seek to stabilize energy markets, enhance energy security and meet net-zero targets, SMRs are rapidly becoming a strategic asset, both financially viable and regulatory adaptable. Their smaller size, modular production and enhanced safety features streamline the investment process, while their ability to be deployed in varied locations reduces permitting complexities compared to traditional nuclear reactors. However, financing, return on investment (ROI) and regulatory approvals remain key challenges and opportunities, shaping the pace at which SMRs will become an operational reality. [37]

The primary economic advantage of SMRs lies in their lower upfront capital costs and modular deployment strategy. Traditional nuclear reactors require multi-billion-dollar investments upfront, with construction timelines extending well over a decade before generating revenue. SMRs, by contrast, are designed to be factory-built, standardized and scalable, reducing capital exposure and allowing for incremental investment strategies. Instead of committing to a single $10 billion+ gigawatt-scale nuclear plant, governments and private investors can finance smaller SMR units, each typically requiring between $1 billion and $2.5 billion, with staged deployment enabling gradual expansion and quicker revenue generation. [38, 39]

Deloitte’s market analysis on nuclear investment highlights that the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for SMRs is expected to range between $50 and $75 per MWh, which competes with renewables but without intermittency issues. [40] Additionally, financial institutions are more willing to fund modular projects, as cost overruns—a major issue in large-scale nuclear—are mitigated through standardized construction processes. This ensures a higher probability of ROI within reasonable investment cycles.

Return on investment (ROI) for SMRs is particularly attractive when considering co-generation capabilities, where SMRs provide not only electricity but also industrial heat and hydrogen production. Hydrogen electrolysis powered by SMRs has been shown to reduce green hydrogen costs by up to 40% compared to renewable-powered alternatives, further strengthening their economic feasibility. Major corporations, including ExxonMobil, Shell and Mitsubishi, are actively exploring SMRs as an alternative to power refineries and industrial processes, demonstrating that their ROI extends beyond electricity markets into industrial decarbonization. [41]

Financing Mechanisms: Public-Private Partnerships and Institutional Investment

Financing SMRs requires a mix of government support, private equity and sovereign investment funds. Unlike large nuclear reactors, which rely heavily on state-backed financing, SMRs attract private investors due to their lower individual unit costs and modular nature. The United States Department of Energy (DOE), through loan guarantees and cost-sharing agreements, is supporting NuScale’s SMR deployment to reduce financial risk for private investors. [42]

In Canada, Ontario Power Generation (OPG) has partnered with GE Hitachi to develop the first grid-connected SMR in the G7, with financial backing from the Canada Infrastructure Bank. The European Union’s SMR Industrial Alliance is also working to mobilize investment mechanisms that will accelerate SMR adoption in member states, integrating financing models similar to renewable energy subsidies to promote nuclear scalability. In similar manner noted is that International financial institutions, such as the World Bank and the European Investment Bank (EIB), traditionally hesitant to fund nuclear projects, are now revising their policies to support low-carbon nuclear investments, particularly in the realm of climate financing. [43] The Great British Nuclear (GBN) program is another example, where the UK government has committed £210 million in grant funding to Rolls-Royce SMR, effectively de-risking private sector investment in SMR deployment.

Regulatory Challenges and Normalization of SMR Licensing

Unlike traditional nuclear reactors, which have been regulated under legacy frameworks designed for large-scale power plants, SMRs require a new approach to licensing, standardization and cross-border regulatory cooperation. One of the largest barriers to SMR commercialization has been the lack of global regulatory harmonization, forcing developers to navigate different licensing requirements in each jurisdiction. [44]

The United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has certified NuScale’s SMR design, marking the first SMR to receive full regulatory approval in the Western world. [45] However, each new SMR project still requires site-specific environmental and operational approvals, adding time and complexity to deployment. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has launched the Nuclear Harmonization and Standardization Initiative (NHSI), aimed at streamlining SMR regulations across different nations, ensuring that once a design is licensed in one country, it can be more easily approved in another. [46] The European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group (ENSREG) and the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) are also pushing for a more unified regulatory framework, particularly within EU nations that are already advancing SMR deployment. The UK’s Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) has introduced a pre-licensing generic design assessment (GDA) process, aimed at reducing approval delays for SMRs, particularly for the Rolls-Royce SMR fleet.

Required Documentation and Permitting for SMR Deployment

For an SMR to become operational, developers must navigate a highly complex set of documentation requirements, including: National Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA), Safety Design Reports (SDR), Emergency Preparedness Plans (EPPs) and Decommissioning and Waste Management Plans amongst others. [47] In the European Union, compliance with the Euratom Treaty is mandatory, ensuring that SMRs meet strict radiation protection standards. The IAEA’s Small Modular Reactor Regulatory Forum is actively working to develop best practices for SMR documentation, ensuring that countries adopting SMRs follow consistent, high-safety protocols.

The Future of SMR Financing and Regulation: A Rapidly Expanding Market

With increasing government-backed investments, streamlined regulatory frameworks and expanding private-sector interest, SMRs are no longer theoretical. They are a near-term commercial reality poised to reshape global energy markets. The global SMR market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 0.73% through 2033, reaching a valuation of $1.92 billion in the European market alone. [48] Meanwhile, in the United States and Canada, strategic public-private partnerships are accelerating SMR deployments, with first-of-their-kind reactors expected to begin commercial operations within the next five to ten years.

Legislative adjustments, coupled with financial backing from both sovereign and institutional investors, are reducing risk perceptions associated with nuclear energy. Nations with coal-reliant energy grids are particularly interested in SMRs, as repowering coal plants with nuclear microreactors offers a direct path to decarbonization without the need for extensive grid overhauls. In this rapidly evolving landscape, SMRs are proving to be the most promising innovation in nuclear energy—one that is economically viable, financially attractive and increasingly supported by a modernized regulatory framework.

Conclusion: SMRs as the Foundation of 21st-Century Energy Security

The global energy transition cannot succeed without a dependable, flexible and scalable power source—one that can support AI-driven economies, energy-intensive industries and resilient national grids. SMRs are not a hypothetical future technology; they are a commercial reality, with active deployments and global investments accelerating at an unprecedented pace. They are the future of scalable, secure and sustainable power generation in the digital age.

The energy revolution is already here.

It’s nuclear.

It’s modular.

And it’s redefining energy security for the digitalized future.

REFERENCES

[1] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2019) International Energy Outlook 2019. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Energy. (https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/ieo2019.PDF)

[2] U.S. Department of Energy (2024) Opportunities for a Modern Grid and Clean Energy Economy. (https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/files/2024-04/AI%20EO%20Report%20Section%205.2g%28i%29_043024.pdf)

[3] International Renewable Energy Agency (2019) A New World: The Geopolitics of the Energy Transformation. (https://www.irena.org/-/media/files/irena/agency/publication/2019/jan/global_commission_geopolitics_new_world_2019.pdf)

[4] UCLA Data Theory. (n.d.). Faces of Big Data: Data is the new electricity. UCLA Data Theory. Available at: https://datatheory.ucla.edu/faces-of-big-data/

[5] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2022). Data centres and data transmission networks. IEA. (https://www.iea.org/energy-system/buildings/data-centres-and-data-transmission-networks)

[6] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). Electricity 2024. IEA. (https://www.iea.org/reports/electricity-2024)

[7] International Energy Agency (IEA). (2024). What the data centre and AI boom could mean for the energy sector. IEA. (https://www.iea.org/commentaries/what-the-data-centre-and-ai-boom-could-mean-for-the-energy-sector)

[8] Statista. (2024). Google energy consumption 2011-2023. Statista. (https://www.statista.com/statistics/788540/energy-consumption-of-google)

[9] S&P Global Market Intelligence. (2024). US Datacenter and Energy Report. S&P Global. (https://pages.marketintelligence.spglobal.com/Datacenter-renewables-US-Datacenter-and-Energy-Report-MS.html)

[10] Cottier, B., Rahman, R., Fattorini, L., Maslej, N., & Owen, D. (2024). The rising costs of training frontier AI models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.21015.

[11] Sourceability. (2025). The Limitations of Renewable Energy in the Face of Growing Data Center Power Demands. Sourceability. (https://sourceability.com/post/the-limitations-of-renewable-energy-in-the-face-of-growing-data-center-power-demand)

[12] Anvari, M., Lohmann, G., Wächter, M., Milan, P., Lorenz, E., Heinemann, D., Rahimi Tabar, M. R., & Peinke, J. (2016). Short term fluctuations of wind and solar power systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.03426. (https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03426)

[13] Cole, W., Frazier, A., & Augustine, C. (2023). Cost Projections for Utility-Scale Battery Storage: 2023 Update. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy23osti/85332.pdf)

[14] World Economic Forum. (2021). Buoyant global outlook for small modular reactors (SMRs). World Economic Forum.(https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/01/buoyant-global-outlook-for-small-modular-reactors-2021/)

[15] Nuclear Energy Institute. (2021). The Economics of Small Modular Reactors. Nuclear Energy Institute. (https://www.nei.org/CorporateSite/media/filefolder/advanced/SMR-Start-Economic-Analysis-2021-(APPROVED-2021-03-22).pdf)

[16] Westinghouse Electric Company. (2024). Westinghouse Releases Economic Impact Report on AP300™ SMR Deployment in Czechia. Westinghouse Electric Company. (https://info.westinghousenuclear.com/news/westinghouse-releases-economic-impact-report-on-ap300-smr-deployment-in-czechia)

[17] GE Vernova. (2021). Transforming Canada’s energy future – The socio-economic impact of GE Hitachi SMRs. GE Vernova. (https://www.gevernova.com/content/dam/gepower-nuclear/global/en_US/documents/economic-impact/Transforming%20Canada%27s%20energy%20future%20%E2%80%93%20The%20socio-economic%20impact%20of%20GE%20Hitachi%20SMRs.pdf)

[18] Kumar, S. (2024). COP29: Why global efforts must reinvigorate towards nuclear power. EY. (https://www.ey.com/en_in/insights/power-utilities/cop-29-why-global-efforts-must-reinvigorate-towards-nuclear-power)

[19] Goldman Sachs. (2025). Is nuclear energy the answer to AI data centers’ power consumption? Goldman Sachs. (https://www.goldmansachs.com/insights/articles/is-nuclear-energy-the-answer-to-ai-data-centers-power-consumption)

[20] Terrell, M. (2024). New nuclear clean energy agreement with Kairos Power. Google. (https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/sustainability/google-kairos-power-nuclear-energy-agreement/)

[21] Constellation Energy. (2024). Constellation to Launch Crane Clean Energy Center, Restoring Jobs and Carbon-Free Power to The Grid. Constellation Energy. Available at: https://www.constellationenergy.com/newsroom/2024/Constellation-to-Launch-Crane-Clean-Energy-Center-Restoring-Jobs-and-Carbon-Free-Power-to-The-Grid.html

[22] PMG Advisory Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością sp.k. (2023). Use of the BWRX-300 technology in Poland. KPMG. (https://osge.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/2023_RAPORT_KPMG_SMR_ENG.pdf)

[23] World Nuclear Association. (2021). Small Nuclear Power Reactors. World Nuclear Association. (https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/nuclear-fuel-cycle/nuclear-power-reactors/small-nuclear-power-reactors)

[24] U.S. Department of Energy. (n.d.). Advanced Small Modular Reactors (SMRs). U.S. Department of Energy. (https://www.energy.gov/ne/advanced-small-modular-reactors-smrs)

[25] Kiesling, L. (2023). The limits of green energy. Cato Institute. (https://www.cato.org/regulation/winter-2022-2023/limits-green-energy)

[26] International Atomic Energy Agency. (2022). Nuclear Hydrogen Production. IAEA. (https://www.iaea.org/topics/non-electric-applications/nuclear-hydrogen-production)

[27] U.S. Department of Defense. (2024). DoD Breaks Ground on Project Pele: A Mobile Nuclear Reactor for Energy Resiliency. U.S. Department of Defense. Available at: https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3915633/dod-breaks-ground-on-project-pele-a-mobile-nuclear-reactor-for-energy-resiliency/

[28] U.S. Department of Energy. (2024). Department of Defense Breaks Ground on Project Pele Microreactor. U.S. Department of Energy. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/ne/articles/department-defense-breaks-ground-project-pele-microreactor

[29] International Energy Forum. (2023). Nuclear Small Modular Reactors: Key Considerations for Deployment. International Energy Forum. (https://www.ief.org/_resources/files/events/nuclear-small-modular-reactors-smrs-key-considerations-for-deployment/smr-report.pdf)

[30] European Commission. (2024). European Industrial Alliance on Small Modular Reactors. European Commission. (https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/industrial-alliances/european-industrial-alliance-small-modular-reactors_en)

[31] UK Research and Innovation. (2021). Over £200 million grant to Rolls-Royce small nuclear reactors. UKRI. (https://www.ukri.org/news/over-200-million-grant-to-rolls-royce-small-nuclear-reactors/)

[32] U.S. Department of Energy. (2024). Repurposing Retired Coal Plants for Energy Future. U.S. Department of Energy. (https://www.energy.gov/policy/articles/repurposing-retired-coal-plants-energy-future)

[33] Ontario Power Generation. (2022). CIB commits $970 million towards Canada’s first Small Modular Reactor. Ontario Power Generation. (https://www.opg.com/releases/cib-commits-970-million-towards-canadas-first-small-modular-reactor/)

[34]] Krane, J. (2023). Ensuring the GCC’s energy future: Reconsidering joint nuclear plant collaboration. Baker Institute for Public Policy. (https://www.bakerinstitute.org/research/ensure-gccs-energy-future-reconsidering-joint-nuclear-plant-collaboration)

[35] The National News. (2024). Gulf states add nuclear power to energy mix as net-zero goals loom. The National News. (https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/energy/2024/06/01/gulf-states-add-nuclear-power-to-energy-mix-as-net-zero-goals-loom/)

[36] United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). (2023). Development and cooperation in nuclear research and energy in the Middle East. UNIDIR. (https://unidir.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/UNIDIR_Development_and_Cooperation_Nuclear_Research_and_Energy_Middle_East.pdf)

[37] OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. (2020). Small Modular Reactors: Challenges and Opportunities. OECD NEA. (https://www.oecd-nea.org/jcms/pl_57979/small-modular-reactors-challenges-and-opportunities)

[38] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2023). What are Small Modular Reactors (SMRs)? IAEA. (https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-are-small-modular-reactors-smrs)

[39] Energy Innovation Reform Project. (2017). What Will Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Cost? Energy Innovation Reform Project. (https://legacy-assets.eenews.net/open_files/assets/2017/07/25/document_gw_07.pdf)

[40] Deloitte. (2023). Small Modular Reactors: Winning the race in securing access to low-carbon energy. Deloitte. (https://www.deloitte.com/fr/fr/our-thinking/explore/climat-developpement-durable/winning-the-race-in-securing-access-to-low-carbon-energy.html)

[41] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2022). Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments. IAEA. (https://aris.iaea.org/Publications/SMR_Booklet_2022.pdf)

[42] NuScale Power. (2014). NuScale and DOE Complete SMR Cooperative Agreement. NuScale Power. (https://www.nuscalepower.com/en/news/press-releases/2014/nuscale-and-doe-complete-smr-cooperative-agreement)

[43] European Investment Bank (EIB). (2023). Mid-term review of the EIB Group Climate Bank Roadmap. EIB. (https://www.eib.org/attachments/lucalli/20230176_mid_term_review_of_the_eib_group_climate_bank_roadmap_en.pdf)

[44] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2022). Lessons Learned in Regulating Small Modular Reactors. IAEA-TECDOC-2003. (https://www.iaea.org/publications/15149/lessons-learned-in-regulating-small-modular-reactor)

[45] U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). (2023). NuScale Small Modular Reactor Design Certification. NRC. (https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/new-reactors/smr/licensing-activities/nuscale.html)

[46] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2023). Nuclear Harmonization and Standardization Initiative. IAEA. (https://www.iaea.org/publications/reports/annual-report/2023/in-focus/nuclear-harmonization-and-standardization-initiative)

[47] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). (2002). Documentation for Use in Regulating Nuclear Facilities. IAEA Safety Standards Series No. GS-G-1.4. (https://www.iaea.org/publications/6418/documentation-for-use-in-regulating-nuclear-facilities)

[48] BIS Research. (n.d.). Europe Small Modular Reactor Market. BIS Research. Available at: https://bisresearch.com/industry-report/europe-small-modular-reactor-market.hrml